← All reviews / Catamaran reviews

Bali 5.2 review
Catamaran · 52 ft (16 m) · Lefkada
expert score
Key specs
- Builder
- Bali
- Model
- Bali 5.2
- Length
- 52 ft (16 m)
- Guests
- 14
- Cabins
- 6
Verdict
The Bali 5.2 is a highly livable family and charter catamaran that prioritizes space, access, and social flow over sporty sailing. It suits buyers who value volume, autonomy, and easy cruising, but it is less appealing if sharp upwind performance is the main goal.
Pros
- +Very large usable living space for a 52-foot catamaran
- +Open-plan layout with strong indoor-outdoor connection
- +High berth and guest capacity for charter or large crews
- +Shallow draft and twin engines suit coastal and island cruising
Cons
- −Heavier, more voluminous design is not especially nimble
- −Upwind performance is more modest than performance-oriented cats
- −Wide beam and cruising systems can make dock handling less simple
- −Space-first layout can feel less private in charter-style configurations
The Bali 5.2 follows the brand’s volume-first approach, using a broad beam, solid foredeck, and open saloon concept to maximize usable space. Its design is aimed at social cruising and charter use rather than minimalist or performance-focused sailing, and that tradeoff is central to the boat’s appeal.
On the water, the 5.2 is best understood as a capable cruising catamaran rather than a fast one. Public reports describe respectable cruising speeds, but also note that it gives up some light-air agility and upwind sharpness compared with leaner multihulls. Twin engines, shallow draft, and large sail handling area make it practical for coastal passages and island hopping, though close-quarters maneuvering still benefits from an experienced skipper.
Comfort is the boat’s strongest attribute. The interior and deck plan are built around easy movement, large gathering areas, and strong ventilation and light, with enough cabin count and guest capacity to suit charter fleets or extended-family cruising. Value is solid if the buyer wants accommodation and autonomy per foot, but the price premium is easier to justify for those who will use the volume and liveability every day.


